Friday, December 25, 2009

நீங்கள் ADMISSION DAY என்ற மனித உரிமை மீறலுக்கு எதிரானவரா ?
இது போன்ற கடிதத்தை உங்கள் மருத்துவமனை
தலைவரிடம் அளியுங்கள் .

அனுப்புதல்,
மருத்துவர் -----------
----------மருத்துவமனை
பெறுதல்
முதல்வ
ர்
ராஜாஜி மருத்துவமனை
மதிப்பிற்குரிய அய்யா ,

பொருள் : தொடர் 24 மணி நேர பனி செய்ய இயலாமை -தொடர்பாக

நான் கடந்த -- வருடமாக அரசு பணியில் சேவை செய்து வருகிறேன் , ஏழை மக்களுக்கு தொண்டு செய்ய வேண்டுமென்ற உயரிய நோக்கதில் அரசு பணியில் தொடர்ந்து வருகிறேன் ,

நமது மருத்துவமனையில் admission day என்ற முறை நடை முறையில் உள்ளது , இதன் படி admission day யில் வேலைக்கு வரும் ஒரு மருத்துவர் , முது நிலை மருத்துவ மாணவர்கள் , பயிற்சி மருத்துவர்கள் தொடர்ந்து 24 மணி நேர பணி செய்ய வேண்டியுள்ளது . இந்த முறையினால் உடல் சோர்வு காரணமாக சிகிச்சையின் தரம் குறைத்து விடுகிறது ,

இந்திய தொழிலாளர் சட்டம் மற்றும் Apprentice Act 1961 ன் படி ஒரு தொழிலாளரை அதிகபச்சம் ஒரு நாளைக்கு 8 மணி நேரம் மட்டுமே வேலையில் ஈடுபடுத்த முடியும் .

எனவே நமது மருத்துவமனை யின் ADMISSION DAY முறையானது சட்டத்திற்கு புறம்பானது மற்று மனித உரிமைக்கு எதிரானது ஆகும் .

எனவே சட்டத்தின் வழி காட்டுதலின் படி மார்ச் 1 க்கு பிறகு எனக்கு வரும் ADMISSION DAY யில் என்னால் 12 மணி நேரம் மட்டுமே [ 7 .30 AM - 7 .30 PM ] வேலை செய்ய முடியும் என்பதை தெரிவித்து கொள்கிறேன் .

மீதி 12 மணி நேரம் வேறு ஒரு நாள் வேலை செய்ய தயாராக உள்ளேன் .

எனவே தங்கள் இது குறித்து உரிய நடவடிக்கை எடுத்து வேறு ஒரு மருத்துவரை பணிக்கு அனுப்பி பணிகள் பதிக்கபடாமல் காக்க வேண்டும் ,

மேலும் ஒரே மருத்துவர் தான் தொடர்ந்து 24 மணி நேரம் பனி செய்ய வேண்டுமென நீங்கள் விரும்பினால் அதற்கான உத்தரவை அளிக்க வேண்டும் எனவும் கேட்டு கொள்கிறேன் .

அவாறான சட்ட விரோத உத்தரவு அளிக்க படுமாயின் நான் அதனை நீதி மன்றத்தில்
உங்களுக்கு எதிராக எதிர் கொள்வேன் என்றும் தெரிவித்து கொள்கிறேன் .


நன்றி
தங்கள் கிழ்படிந்த
------------------

நகல் :
1 . மாண்புமிகு முதலமைச்சர்
2 . மாண்புமிகு சுகாதார துறை அமைச்சர்
3 . தமிழ் நாடு மனித உரிமை ஆணையம்
4 . மருத்துவ கல்வி இயக்குனர்
5 . மற்றும் அனைத்து பத்திரிகைகள்




PGs Eligible for Week Off and National Holidays : TN MGR Univ Circular Based on Madras High Court Judgement


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :-17.02.2011

Coram


The HONOURABLE MR.M.Y.EQBAL THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
The HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.S.SIVAGNANAM

W.P.No.2454 of 2010

E.Pradeep Prem Kumar ... Petitioner
vs.

1.State of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. by the Secretary,
Health and Family Welfare Department,
Chennai 600009.

2.The Medical Council of India,
Rep. by the Registrar,
Pocket 14, Sector 8, Dwarka Phase 1
New Delhi 110 077.

3.The Registrar
Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University,
No.69, Anna Salai, Guindy,
Chennai.

4.The Director of Medical Education,
EVR Periyar Road,
Kilpauk, Chennai 600010. ... Respondents

PRAYER : This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to prescribe working hours, weekly off, leave including maternity leave, holidays, etc. for the post graduate degree students in the medical colleges affiliated to respondent 3-Tamil Nadu Dr.MGR Medical University, Chennai within a time as may be fixed.


For petitioner :Mr.M.Radhakrishnan
For Respondents :Mr.G.Sankaran Spl. G.P. for R1 & R4
Mr.V.P.Raman for R2
Mr.P.Wilson AAG for Mr.S.Saravanan for RR3

O R D E R

THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE &
T.S.SIVAGNANAM, J.

By way of this public interest litigation, the petitioner who is undergoing his post graduate M.S. degree course in Tirunelveli Medical College and Hospital, has sought for a direction upon the respondents to prescribe working hours, weekly off, leave including maternity leave, holidays, etc. for the post graduate degree students in medical colleges affiliated to the third respondent University.

2. The case of the petitioner is that a candidate, who joins a post graduate programme in any one of the affiliated colleges of the third respondent University, is compelled to work for 24 hours on all 365 days and the third respondent University has failed to frame any regulation to regulate the working hours, and no provision has been made by the University as regards the leave entitlement and the University has totally ignored the relevance of reasonable working hours and need for rest for the students.
It is further stated that the Medical Council of India has framed regulations and under Regulation 13.3, there is a duty cast upon the University and the State Government to frame leave rules for such post graduate students. The petitioner has placed reliance on the residency programme, which has been implemented by the Government of Kerala by G.O.Ms.No.20, dated 13.01.2009, and submits that the students undergoing post graduate course of study in Kerala State get 20 days casual leave in a year and 15 days special leave to participate in the conference and seminars and maternity leave upto 4 months with full stipend for women and weekly off for one day. The petitioner further states that the residency scheme in JIPMER also stipulates that working hours should not exceed 12 hours at a time. Thus, the petitioner states that the respondents should frame regulations by prescribing working hours for the post graduate degree students in the medical colleges affiliated to the third respondent University.


3. The Medical Council of India (MCI) have filed a counter affidavit inter alia contending that in exercise of powers conferred under Sections 20 and 33 of the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956, the MCI has published the Post Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2000, which was approved by the Government of India and as per clauses 13.2 & 13.3, of the said regulation, all candidates joining post graduate training programme shall attend not less than 80% of the imparted training during each academic year and the matter for grant of leave to post graduate students shall be regulated as per the respective State Government Rules. It has been further stated that this Court exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, would not be justified to substitute its opinion over the opinion of the expert bodies created under the statue.

4. The third respondent University in their affidavit have stated that an expert committee has framed regulations for cut off date for admission to Under Graduate/Post Graduate/Diploma courses and percentage of attendance required to appear for the University examination. The said regulations were approved by the Standing Academic Board in its meeting held on 21.06.2010 and the same was approved in resolution passed by the Governing Council in its meeting held on 14.07.2010. Further, the expert committee in its meeting held on 11.08.2010, after making necessary scrutiny and deliberations have framed the regulation with regard to leave to the post graduate students to the effect that the cut off date for admission to Post Graduate Degree/Diploma course is 31st May of every year, the classes will commence from 1st May of the same year and the University examination will commence from 15th April of the next year.
90% of the attendance of the course period excluding any kind of leave is mandatory for the post graduate students to appear for the University examination and there shall be no condonation for lack of attendance for post graduate degree courses. It is further stated that the expert committee has followed the same regulations as approved by the Standing Academic Board in its meeting held on 21.06.2010. With the above averments, the third respondent University prayed for dismissal of the writ petition.


5. Though the State Government has impleaded as the first respondent, and they have not filed counter affidavit.

6. Heard Mr.M.Radhakrishnan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Mr.P.Wilson, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for the third respondent University, Mr.V.P.Raman, learned counsel appearing for the Medical Council of India and Mr.G.Sankaran, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents 1 & 4.

7. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would vehemently contend that the candidates, who are pursuing the post graduate programme in the colleges affiliated to the third respondent University are virtually treated like bonded labourers and compelled to work all 365 days of the year for 24 hours a day; they are all compelled to work for 36 hours continuously, which is not only conducive for the candidates, but detrimental to the patients, who are treated, since as the post graduate students, they are interns and on account of long working hours, the public are put to danger. The learned counsel placing emphasis on the scheme introduced by the Government of Kerala submits that a similar scheme/regulation has to be introduced in the State of Tamil Nadu.
The learned counsel further placed reliance on survey reports, which were conducted in the United States as well as United Kingdom relating to extended duration of work shifts and submits that the survey has reported that on account of extended duration of work shifts has increased the risk of significant medical errors, adverse events and attentional failures in interns across the United States and the results have important public policy implications for postgraduate medical education. Therefore, it is contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that time has come for the State Government to act and relieve such post graduate interns from such extended working hour
s.


8. The learned Additional Advocate General submits that the petitioner's contention that the post graduate students/interns are treated as bonded labourers, is ridiculous and the petitioner has lost sight of the fact that the students, who are pursuing their post graduate programme are to be actively associated in the treatment process either surgical or medical procedures and the patient is the study material and a duty is cast on them to be available to render assistance to team of Doctor under whom these post graduate students are attached.
The learned Additional Advocate General further submits that the post graduate students are attached to a unit headed by a Professor and they are actively associated in the treatment process, which would equip them better to face future challenges. The learned Additional Advocate General would further submit that the reliance placed on the scheme implemented by the Government of Kerala is of no relevance, since under the scheme framed by the Government of Kerala a resident Doctor is a temporary employee, therefore, certain rules have been framed for the purpose of granting leave by the Government of Kerala and the nature of duties and responsibilities of an interns pursuing post graduate programme in the State of Tamil Nadu is entirely different and it cannot be compared to that of the State of Kerala. Further, the learned counsel placed reliance on the regulation framed by the University, which states that each academic year shall consist of not less than 200 working days and 90% attendance is compulsory.


9. It is seen that the Government of Kerala by G.O.Ms.No.20, dated 13.01.2009, issued certain directions for implementation of residency programme in Government medical colleges in the State of Kerala. The genesis of such programme is based on a report submitted by a one man committee and the Government accepted the recommendations made by one man committee and evolved a new scheme. It is significant to note under the scheme evolved by the Government of Kerala, a resident doctor has to function as the junior most staff member in the respective department to provide teaching and training and services to the patients and they are the first level managers of specialty departments.
Further, under the scheme a resident doctor will be a temporary employee of the institution. The scheme has also fixed remuneration based on the nature of postgraduate study, which the candidate pursues.

10. As rightly pointed out by the learned Additional Advocate General, the postgraduate programme in the State of Tamil Nadu, as regulated by the third respondent University, is different from that of the programme in the State of Kerala. Under the regulations framed by the University called the Regulation for the M.S. Postgraduate Degree Clinical courses, it has been stipulated that each academic year shall consist of not less than 200 working days.
The regulation also stipulates the attendance requirements and also specifically states that there shall be no condonation of attendance in postgraduate courses. Therefore, the petitioner may not be justified in approach this Court to direct the academicians to frame a scheme in line with the scheme implemented by the Government of Kerala.


11. As noticed above, the postgraduate residents in State of Kerala are being treated as temporary employees of the respective institution and thereby certain rules and regulations, which are applicable to regular employees have been extended to them. It is for the policy makers and academicians to decide as to what would be the best procedure/regulation to be adopted bearing in mind not only the excellent of education, quality of student training and more importantly safety of the patients. It is not in dispute that the students pursuing the postgraduate programme assist the team of doctors in the unit, which they are post graduate for administering the treatment to the patients. The concept of internship is "learn and serve". Therefore, if a postgraduate students is over worked and on account of fatigue, there is any error in the line of treatment, it would undoubtedly be against public interest.

12. At this stage, we may refer to a study, which was conducted in the United States, the report which has been downloaded from the website www.plosmedicine.org. This report has been prepared by a research group who wanted to find out whether long shifts worked by interns in USA had an effect on reported medical errors and hence patient safety and specifically whether any harm that happened to patients might otherwise have been preventable. The research appears to have been conducted all US medical school graduates beginning their internships from one particular year-group, by email, and each person was asked whether they wanted to take part in a confidential survey. Individuals who agreed to participate were required to complete a form each month giving details about their working hours, hours of sleep number of extended-duration shifts etc. It is reported that a total of 2,737 interns took part in the survey. It has been stated that in the US medical students, who are doing their internship (first year of postgraduate clinical training) regularly work in the clinic for longer than 24 hours at a time and that doctors are students who work for long shifts make more medical errors and are less able to pay attention to what they are doing. The conclusion of the survey is to the following effect:-
In our survey, extended-duration work shifts were associated with an increased risk of significant medical errors, adverse events, and attentional failures in interns across the United States. These results have important public policy implications for postgraduate medical education."

13. In an article "Surgical Training and Working Time Restriction" published in the British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd, it has been stated as follows:-
"Working time restriction has been enforced by law in Europe and North America, decreasing the time that can be spent training in hospital. These regulations are driven by concern that fatigued trainees who have been deprived of sleep are prone to increased error when delivering care.
.... Furthermore, truck drivers and airline pilots have far more restrictive duty hours than surgeons, and surgeons are not immune to the effects of sleep deprivation and unnatural circadian cycles associated with long shifts. It is also true that trainees' quality of life is improved with shorter hours of duty; they experience a decrease in depression scores and emotional exhaustion, have less risk of motor vehicle accident, have more time with their families, and more time to read."

14. We have referred to the above survey reports and study material with a view to impress upon to the respondent to take a fresh look in the matter bearing in mind that attentional failures in interns leading to medical errors may have disastrous consequences and ultimately affecting public health. Moreover the time schedule fixed in the Government hospitals as also corporate hospitals compelling the doctors doing post graduate courses/interns to work continuously 36 hours or even 24 hours at one stretch cannot be appreciated.
Therefore, the respondents may take note of the above study and if so advice could constitute a team to conduct a study on the conditions prevailing in Tamil Nadu and if the study report reveals a disturbing trend in error of diagnosis or treatment, the respondent shall revisit the matter and frame fresh regulations to regulate the pattern of the postgraduate programme in line with the programme schedule adopted in other countries.


15. For the above reasons, we dispose of the writ petition with the above observations. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.










pbn

To

1.State of Tamil Nadu,
Rep. by the Secretary,
Health and Family Welfare Department,
Chennai 600009.

2.The Medical Council of India,
Rep. by the Registrar,
Pocket 14, Sector 8, Dwarka Phase 1
New Delhi 110 077.

3.The Registrar
Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University,
No.69, Anna Salai, Guindy,
Chennai.

4.The Director of Medical Education,
EVR Periyar Road,
Kilpauk,
Chennai 600010
















mba-online-program.com






















































THE GBM HELD ON 31/12/2009





NEWS ON DINAMANI ON 01/01/2010







DINAKARAN



THE HINDU


LETTER TO OUR H'BLE DEAN
From,
The CRRIs,
K.A.P.V. Government Medical College &
Annal Gandhi Memorial Government Hospital,
Trichy.

To,
The Dean,
K.A.P.V. Government Medical College &
Annal Gandhi Memorial Government Hospital,
Trichy.

Respected Sir,
Sub: Intimation of resolution passed in the general body meeting of CRRIs – regarding.

The resolutions(9) passed in the GBM held on 21-12-2009
I.In our hospital an admission-day procedure is followed where an intern is involved in his duty (the duties mentioned above) for 31 hours continuously without rest. Involving a person in duty for 31 hours is a human right violation. In this civilized society nobody will justify 31 hours of duty continuously without rest.
As per the Constitution of India and Apprentice Act 1961 it is clear that a person can be involved in duty continuously without any rest for 8 hours only even if he is a resident. But we are ready to work for a maximum of 14 hours. We will take minimum of 10 hours for rest and sleep in between in rotation.

II. In K.A.P.V. Government Medical College Hospital about 106 students are doing our internship. We are doing all the following works.
1. Giving the due injections to all the patients in the wards,
2. Taking and labeling blood samples for all investigations,
3. Transporting the blood samples to the lab,
4. Collecting the investigation reports from the lab,
5. Taking blood sample for grouping and cross matching,
6. Disposal of Out-patients,
7. Transporting the blood from the blood bank to the ward,
8. Transfusion of blood,
9. Taking ECG for all the patients in the ward,
10. Writing all the case-sheets and the review notes daily,
11. Writing the discharge summaries for all cases ,
12. Getting opinions,
13. Accompanying patients during special investigations,
14. Collecting the X-rays of medico-legal cases by giving due slips.
All the above duties are made as our sole responsibilities & we are doing them as our routine duties.
We are getting only stipend which any intern, trainee, postgraduates (M.Phil, M.E, etc), Research associates and scholars are entitled to get. It is not the salary that we cannot be held responsible for the routine works in the hospital.
But as per the Regulation 14 prescribed by the Medical Council of India, called “ Medical Council Of India Regulations on Graduate Medical Education, 1997”, it is clear that interns are expected only to learn and acquire medical skills and not to merely indulge in clerical and para-medical work for the entire one year period of internship.

The duties we have been doing are only a very small part of what we are expected to learn. There are so many procedures (both diagnostic & therapeutic), skills, handling of instruments, life-saving measures, critical care procedures and emergency resuscitation techniques prescribed in the Regulation 14 laid down by the MCI, none of which we are able to learn and acquire. By carrying out only all the clerical and para-medical work, we are unable to involve in academic activities, patient care and follow-up.
From 01/01/10 we have decided to abstain from some of the para-medical and clerical works as follows
1) Giving the due injections to all the patients in the wards,
2) Taking and labeling blood samples for all investigations,
3) Transporting the blood samples to the lab,
4) Collecting the investigation reports from the lab,
5) Taking blood sample for grouping and cross matching,
6) Transportation of blood from the blood bank to the ward,
7) Taking ECG for all the patients in the ward,
8) Collecting the X-rays of medico-legal cases by giving due slip which we are not authorized to do.

III. We are going to only learn the skills as prescribed by the MCI guidelines. Moreover there are more than 900 persons including paid employees and trainees(Staff nurses(158), student nurses(360), MNAs (12)& FNAs(6), MNA & FNA trainees(38),Hospital servants(60), Laboratory technicians(25), DMLT students(160), blood bank technicians (2), Theatre technician (1), Emergency technician trainees (18), Respiratory Technician trainees (14), Dialysis Technician trainees (18),Anesthesia technician trainees (26), Theatre Technician trainees (26), Ortho technician trainees (12) and their like approximately)
Therefore when 100 CRRIs are quitting their clerical and Para-medical work there will be no hardship or detriment to patient-care.
However, as no rules are applicable in cases of emergency, we are ready to do anything during times of emergency.

IV. Hereafter we will involve more in
1. Detailed Clinical examination,
2. Detailed case sheet writing,
3. Emergency & elective procedures,
4. Conduct diagnostic procedures like pleural tap, ascitic tap, biopsy procedures,
5. Rehabilitative & palliative measures,
6. Conducting and assisting surgical procedures,
7.Diagnose and manage acute emergencies like shock, cardiac failure, pulmonary edema, burns, poisoning and seizures,
8.Conducting surveys and arriving at community diagnosis,
9.Critical care & Resuscitation techniques,
10.Initiation & participation in discussions and research aptitude,
11.Work-up of interesting cases and their follow-up as per the MCI regulation 14 “The Regulation on Graduate Medical Education, 1997”.

V. After finishing this internship we are going to enter this consumer era as medical practitioners. So we want to come out as fully fledged, well-qualified doctors by utilizing this golden period of internship by LEARNING MEDICINE and not this kind of paramedical and clerical works.

VI. We have not been given week-off. So it is decided to appeal to the administration to give weekly off to the CRRIs which is not denied in the MCI Regulation 14

VII. We are not getting stipend every month and it has been kept on pending. So it is decided to insist the administration on the monthly dispatch of the stipend.

VIII. It is decided by all the CRRIs to form an association to proceed with the grievances of the CRRIs. Hereby office bearers are selected and they are given power to take decision regarding the issues.

IX. To intimate the resolutions(9) to the DEAN and the administration one week prior to January 2010.

Thanking You,


Trichy, Yours obediently,
21.12.09 THE CRRI'S

Copy to:

.The Honorable Governor of Tamil Nadu (The Honorable Chancellor of Tamil Nadu DR.M.G.R.Medical University,)
.The Vice Chancellor of Tamil Nadu DR.M.G.R.Medical University ,
.The State Human Right Commission, Tamil Nadu,
.The Secretary, Medical Council of India,
.The Health Secretary, Department of Health & Family Welfare, Tamil Nadu,
.The Director of Medical Education, Tamil Nadu.
ENCLOSURE:
Signatures of all the CRRIs agreeing in the passing of the above resolutions







APPEAL TO THE GOVERNOR
From,
The House Surgeons,
K.A.P.V. Government Medical College,
Annal Gandhi Memorial Government Hospital,
Trichy.

To,
The Honorable Governor of Tamil Nadu,
Raj Bhavan
Guindy,
Chennai.

His Excellency,

Subject: Requisition to interfere in involving the House Surgeons in duty for 31 hours continuously – a human right violation – regarding.
1. About 106 house surgeons (Compulsory Rotatory Interns)are doing our internship in K.A.P.V. Government Medical College Hospital

2. Being Residential interns, we are involved in duty for 31 hours continuously for about 3 days per week in addition to 10 hours in the other days

3. In the Admission-Day procedure which is followed in Medical College Hospitals, a house surgeon reports to duty at 7.30 A.M and works for the whole day (24 hours).He continues his duty on the next day (the Post-admission Day) up to 2.30 P.M(7 hours) without any rest in between or any time for sleep.

4. When we are posted in the Department of Paediatrics for a duration of two months, we are involved in 31 hours of continuous duty on alternate days. That is, in a period of 60 days a house surgeon will have to work for 30 days without sleep or rest.

5. In the name of training, a house surgeon is involved in the following duties for 31 hours during admission days:
· Disposal of out-patients
· Writing case-sheets in the triage ward
· Giving due injections for all the patients in the wards
· Collection and transportation of blood samples
· Transporting blood for transfusion from the blood bank
· Transfusing blood and monitoring the transfusion
· Writing discharge summaries for the cases being discharged
· Providing emergency and critical care to needed patients

6. We are involved in both physical and mental work for 31 hours continuously.

7. We are not permitted to sleep or take rest in between.


8. In this way a house-surgeon who is physically & mentally exhausted for 31 hours is unable to examine all the patients completely and give complete treatment to the patient. Because of this, patient care is compromised.


9. When the Constitution of India clearly states that any labourer, trainee or apprentice can only be involved in duty for 8+4 hours continuously, it is not followed only in the case of house surgeons.

10. When we appealed to the Directorate of Medical Education & The Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University there was no response.

11. As we have no other go, we appeal to your Excellency, the Chancellor of Tamil Nadu Dr.M.G.R. Medical University & the Honorable Governor of Tamil Nadu to interfere in this HUMAN RIGHT VIOLATION and save us from being exploited and regulate the working hours of a house surgeon.
Thanking You,
Yours Obediently,
28-12-2009 The House Surgeons
Trichy

10 comments:

  1. வெற்றி பெற வாழ்த்துக்கள்

    ReplyDelete
  2. Good move.... We will support...
    Gopi
    Stanley Medical College....

    ReplyDelete
  3. nice work.hope things change as v desire

    ReplyDelete
  4. i finished crri, just as u said as a slave, learnt only para-medical works much..i give my full support. pass it to all CRRI's n tamilnadu and pls make this dream come true. best of luck

    ReplyDelete
  5. excellent resolution passed,it has to be implemented to all colleges in tamilnadu as early as possible-TVMCH

    ReplyDelete
  6. kkmc supports..this should come true..

    ReplyDelete
  7. awesome effort....but nobody is ready to do same in chennai...am from KMC and will love to come out in support of this...it's equally rubbish here out too...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Im doin my internship in pondicherry..my college does not pay interns and pgs.. but all of us are forced to do all sorts of clerical jobs and even worser jobs..is there anything we can do??plz help..

    ReplyDelete
  9. I strongly support this if we forward letters from all colleges to concerned authorities I hope necessary action will be taken.. Waiting for my completion lets make it larger expand to all colleges..

    ReplyDelete

Followers